Top Bar

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Brave New World

“Everybody belongs to everybody else.”

In the 1930’s, Huxley envisioned a distant future where mankind peacefully co-exist in a one world-state. Beautiful humans are bred in labs, conditioned from birth, assigned work, and expected to pursue only hedonist endeavours in their leisure time. Young adults are encouraged to explore each other with ‘erotic play’. Technology ensures beauty and libido are maintained well into old age and everybody is promiscuous until death.

Basically, life is one big orgy.

Everybody belongs to everybody else.

Well, I have visited this brave new world. It’s called Scandinavia. (Or the Nordic countries, to get technical.)

Okay, so the Danes are grown in test tubes and the Norse aren’t getting programmed in their sleep, but in terms of sluttery, the Nordic tribes top the charts.

The average age to loose you virginity in Iceland is 15.

Sweden have the highest divorce rate in the world (55%).

In 2008, a U.S. university study of international promiscuity found that Finns have had the largest number of sex partners.

Incidentally, these are also the most ‘feminist’ countries on earth. I wonder what Huxley would think if he were alive today, listening to women chatter in the cafés of Stockholm, where the maxims of third-wave feminism and ‘political correctness’ have become the normalised narrative in society.

“Gender is an illusion.”

“Have fun when you’re young.”

“It’s only sex. If men can fuck around, why can’t we?”

I can also confirm this from personal experience. Nordic women are the easiest chicks I’ve ever experienced. No shit, the last girl I banged in Stockholm actually had “Welcome” tattooed above her vagina.

Now that these women have economic freedom, birth control, and a state that will raise their children, they can screw around  as they want. It’s hypergamy gone mad. Such tools and technology have done for women what porn has done for men (fucking up their brain structure in the process). Nordic men have become play-things and their women have become cum-buckets. Romanticism and chastity are laughed at­—something only reserved for the ageing, the unattractive, and the economically challenged.

Everybody belongs to everybody else.

This is our future. This is our brave new world—and America and the UK have already already signed up to this genderless, feminised, cultural Marxist fantasy. And why not? After all, who doesn’t like loads of easy women?

But it’s not all sunshine and rainbows.

This is a world of broken homes and broken hearts, where mothers and fathers have been replaced by dependent sheep suckling from the bosom of the state. 

It is a world where men are forced to exercise their masculinity vicariously through Call of Duty, and women have spent so much time trying to emulate men, they’ve lost much of what made them special in the first place.

More and more young men is this system are dropping out. They are in search of greener pastures. They are traipsing across the world to find more feminine women. To find themselves.

It’s a world that has distanced itself from our basic nature. While society and technology develops at light speed, human nature does not. People forget the wheels of evolution are very slow indeed. We can talk about being ‘progressive’ all we want, but our fundamental genetic imperatives remain indifferent to all the propaganda and whispers in our ears.

On the most primal level, a man doesn’t want to develop a meaningful relationship a woman who gives it up easy—who has fucked so many guys she has lost count. A woman should be choosy with her mate. Her hind brain knows that pregnancy and mate selection are very risky things. Her instincts know she must choose a man who will ensure her survival and survival of her offspring. It is her genetic imperative. Everything else means nothing. If a woman risks that so easily, what instinctive response might you expect from us men?

Pump and dump.

We will fuck you, forget you, and later move on to find a more virtuous woman. They can socialise men to tolerate female promiscuity all they want, but in our hearts, no man of value could stick around for a woman with a super-high notch count.

We will choose mothers from the East.

Enjoy your brave new world. I’m off to Saudi Arabia to live a cave :p

28 Responses to Brave New World

  1. Starting Young & Aiming High October 28, 2012 at 1:17 pm #

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate

    The Nordic suicide rate isn’t that high relative to other developed states. America’s male suicide rate is higher than Sweden, Norway and Denmark

    • Naughty Nomad October 28, 2012 at 2:28 pm #

      @pdog: Thanks. I read that in a recent publication. My sources must be incorrect. I’ve made edits.
      @JJ : I agree, but it’s such a great word. I just don’t think that excessive female promiscuity is attractive for a potential mother of my child.

  2. JJ Roberts October 28, 2012 at 1:32 pm #

    Only partly agree.

    You are quite right in sayng that genetic imperatives dont care at all about whatever the latest progressive idea is, however the idea of slutiness is a silly concept and a very recently created one at that.

    You are choosng to live in fear if you want to believe in it but thats your choice.

    The existence of humanity has always relied on both males and females to have a lot of sex partners. We are bioligically built for sperm competition.

    As for cuckolding fear (which is what slut shaming was invented for) we have this thing called DNA paternity testing now.

  3. JJ Roberts October 28, 2012 at 4:59 pm #

    I never said promiscuity is good

    I made my thoughts on that quite clear here :

    http://sexthreepointzero.com/2012/04/05/is-promiscuity-wrong/

    But fear based slut shaming is a Sex 2.0 mentality that serves no-one. It benefits all concerned if you just drop it.

    It goes against your programming I know but the programming is the problem, not the number of sex partners of any particular woman.

    Its not something that should concern you even if you are planning to have kids (which as far as I know you are not anway).

  4. tim October 28, 2012 at 6:10 pm #

    the search for a feminine woman…come to japan. princess peach is on every corner. although being a foreigner is far from an easy ticket in; and suicide rates are high here (second highest in the world for women i believe).

    and femininity and subservience seem to have merged here; i’m still on the fence how i feel about their lack of assertiveness.

  5. Sargon of Akkad October 28, 2012 at 6:11 pm #

    You’re making a very big logical fallacy by implying that Scandinavia’s high suicide and depression rates are due to these countries’ widespread promiscuity. Basically, you’re assuming that since these two things occur together, one must be the cause of the other. It doesn’t work that way.

    Assuming that correlation equals causation is just bad logic. If Event A occurs next to Event B, it could be that A was caused by B, but it could just as easily mean B was caused by A, or that both A and B share a common cause C, or the two could share no relation at all.

    The high depression rates in Scandinavia are more likely affected by the long periods of prolonged night in those countries, not to fucking around too much.

  6. Grant October 28, 2012 at 7:03 pm #

    Excellent!

    Your best post so far, in my opinion.

    (My gf thought you were speaking about Arab Eastern women but I think you mean Eastern Europeans)

  7. asdf October 29, 2012 at 3:01 am #

    JJ,

    Female promiscuity damages the woman’s pair bonding capacity. If she can’t pair bond the possibility of a successful marriage goes down. Most of us want to raise our children in a marriage (in fact its the only way for us to do so, because women get the kids in divorce).

  8. Lee October 29, 2012 at 2:07 pm #

    Hmm not sure I would quote AH, but Sweden does have wallander and Iceland has night shift;they may be on to something!!

  9. Jon October 30, 2012 at 12:18 am #

    Female promiscuity is something that has gone on for ages. The thing is that up until now it has been taboo for women to actually talk about and admit to their past sexual experiences. Not too long ago a woman who openly admitted to having casual sex was labeled a whore, even if it was casual sex with only one man, but now in many countries that woman is just embracing pleasure.

    The biggest sufferer in this “new world” you describe will undoubtedly be the male ego. Very few men want to hear or think about the number of past sexual partners a woman has had before. Hell very few men are even willing to entertain the notion that that chick who they slept with has probably had sex with more people than them. For example, I got into an argument with a young white guy who refused to believe that the Filipina who he met online and slept with him in less than 3 hours had been with other foreigners. In his words, “I know she only had 1 Filipino boyfriend because she told me.” Even if you recall your own experiences, how often do you think there was quickly another man when the women realized they could not get what they wanted from you? Or how often have you been the other guy?

    There is really little difference between a man who sport fucks and a woman who does it. Before anyone says something stupid about how it makes the vagina loose, most women could fuck 200 men and their vagina would change very little in size, especially if they have never had a child.

  10. Kint October 30, 2012 at 3:43 pm #

    So you don’t like your future girlfriend to fuck around? That’s perfectly fine. But all the conclusions and judgements you make on Scandinavian society seem to come from nowhere. Are scandinavia riddled with depression? I didn’t know, what’s your sources? According to this list it seems having women who likes fucking around is the surest way to raise national happines, all countries are on the top 20 list 😉 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satisfaction_with_Life_Index

    • Naughty Nomad October 31, 2012 at 12:44 pm #

      @Kint: Good info and thanks for your contribution! There appears to be an interesting paradox here. I didn’t say Scandinavian are ‘riddled’ with depression. I stated that such things persist in spite of socially liberal ideals. I wonder what would be the results of the research you’ve linked to if it only accounted for the divorced and their kid (a massive percentage in the region), and discounted the single and the young who have fucked themselves into a blissful bubble of indifference.

    • Naughty Nomad October 31, 2012 at 12:44 pm #

      @Kint: Good info and thanks for your contribution! There appears to be an interesting paradox here. I didn’t say Scandinavian are ‘riddled’ with depression. I stated that such things persist in spite of socially liberal ideals. I wonder what would be the results of the research you’ve linked to if it only accounted for the divorced and their kids (a massive percentage in the region), and discounted the single and the young who have fucked themselves into a blissful bubble of indifference.

    • tadaa April 13, 2014 at 2:15 pm #

      They might be “happy”, but Nordic countries also rank high on prescription drug usage (mostly anti-anxiety pills, Denmark tops that list worldwide) and alcohol abuse is widespread. The Nordic people are good at masking depression by easing it with substance abuse (source: I`m from Finland).

  11. JJ Roberts October 30, 2012 at 3:57 pm #

    asdf, did you even read my post about promescuity? The link I posted?

  12. Lee October 31, 2012 at 5:37 pm #

    The perceived high Scandinavian suicide rate may have something to do with daylight hours in the winter and not enough serotonin or perhaps national stereotyping by us. I know two Swedish women and they are both stunning and snobby, but it’s just a good old B*tch shield at work. Because they were both very funny tarts! Curious thing about feminism is that its mostly academic women telling women what to do and at the same time telling women not to let men tell them what to do. If modern feminism, to Swedes, means to fuck about as much as men, then it is our DUTY as modern men to help these sexually emancipated women to achieve this gender equality in the early 21st century. Rolf Lassgard for President!

  13. Rob November 1, 2012 at 3:34 am #

    Naughty – I find it the height of irony that you maintain a very popular blog devoted to sport fucking lots of women around the world, capturing flags, etc. and then seem to be saying that female promiscuity is bad. Do you think you are sleeping with virgins? It seems like if you are promoting a life of travel and casual sex then you would need plenty of promiscous women around. Guys need to understand that game and fast lays is not about seducing good girls and virgins. It’s meant to identify DTF girls quickly and get the lay.

    As for the theory that promiscuous women don’t make good wives or moms where is your evidence of this? It’s clear you are judging women badly for engaging in the same casual sex you are engaging in. Would that make you less of a dad or husband? By the way I have a news flash for you – when a woman senses you will judge her for the number of sex partners she has had she will NEVER tell you the true number. So the good girl you think you are marrying that told you she only had one boyfriend before you is not going to tell you about the 20 guys she fucked in college. Just get over yourself and stop being jealous, it does not matter how many guys a girl has fucked before you.

    • Naughty Nomad November 1, 2012 at 1:03 pm #

      @Rob: You’re making the assumption that men and women are equal when it comes to sexual behavioural. We have different genetic imperatives. The number of sexual partners a woman has had is the directly correlated to the likelihood of infidelity. You come look that up.

  14. JJ Roberts November 2, 2012 at 2:31 am #

    @Naughty Nomad which does not change the fact that the notion of infidelity (for men or women) is a ridiculous and artificial Sex 2.0 concept that you are best rid of.

    The alternative is fear-based love relationships if you want anything long term.

    If that’s what you want then that’s your choice but good luck to you with that.

    • Naughty Nomad November 2, 2012 at 12:11 pm #

      @JJ: ‘Fear-based’ is a little strong. I know you advocate unfenced realtionships.. as do I, but how do you propose such a relationship would work if you are raising children with a mother under the same roof? I stuggle with this. How to you raise Family 3.0?

  15. JJ Roberts November 2, 2012 at 2:35 pm #

    @NN Its not accurate to say that I advocate unfenced relationships. I advocate freedom of choice.

    One of the key concepts of living in a sex 3.0 era is the rejection of what I call “relationship duress”. Relationship duress basically means telling other people what they should or must do when it comes to their sexual relationships (including labeling women as sluts).

    As I don’t believe in relationship duress, I cannot be an advocate of either fenced or unfenced.

    There is no right choice. Only the choice that is right for you.

    If a person wanted an unfenced relationship and wanted to have children too then the two people involved would clearly need to come to an agreement as to legal and financial responsibilities. How you would go about that changes vastly from country to country.

    You could, for example if you were French, form a pacte civil de solidarité or PACS which is very popular. You could form a civil union if the laws in your country supported that or you could just draw up your own legal agreement drafted and agreed between the two of you.

  16. Rob November 4, 2012 at 3:46 am #

    Naughty – the studies you refer to make the link between promiscuity and infidelity in both men and women. Perhaps men and women are not as different as you believe.

  17. solo November 6, 2012 at 2:50 pm #

    I want to back up pretty much everything in this post (though I agree covariance doesn’t NECESSARILY imply a causal relationship, and I think also Anglo women are about as promiscupus as Swedish ones). Source: I lived in Sweden for 25+ years.

    As for those criticising NN for double standards….Consider the fact that girls cannot procreate with more than one member of the opposite sex at the same time, unlike men.

    Also, before artificial constructs such as feminism, the Welfare State and the media all conspiring to make them act like men, they were pretty much completely dependent on the father of their child for food, shelter etc. So they were less likely to be promiscuous (if they slept around there was no way of knowing who was the father of the child – and therefore any one man would be less inclines to take care of it). This is not even mentioning the fact that historically men used to kill them self off in wars all the time, so there was a often shortage of men. Not really the demographics that facilitates female promiscupusness. All these factors, combined with the traditional division of labour (men working, women looking after the house and children) led to monogamous relationships and often the alpha males that could support large families were able to form harems. I doubt women have ever been able to have harems much in history (until now when they can do so thanks to feminism and divorce rape etc).

    My point is, men are polygamous and women are largely monogamous and hypergamous. The idea that girls should be able to fuck around as much as men comes from feminism, and wouldn’t be sustainable if it weren’t for the factors I mentioned and because they are indirectly supported financially by men who finance most of the Welfare State etc

    The sperm competition argument doesn’t prove anything. It was hardly an evolutionary disadvantage to have competetive sperm, so it just “stuck” throughout evolution. It doesn’t prove that women have always been promiscuous (of course some always were though).

    Stop buying the feminist lies. I agree with NN in finding more virtuous women for forming a family.

  18. Tom November 8, 2012 at 5:04 pm #

    Brother I met you in Tbilisi about a month ago, and I forgot to tell you something.

    There is such a place that exists where you may have virtually unlimited sex….. Retox party hostel, Budapest. That place is insane. It even has rooms for purely for fucking. Highly recommended!

  19. cockmaster November 15, 2012 at 8:29 am #

    http://www.visitaswede.com/

    pipeline sweden with this site….found it on thelocal.com

  20. C November 25, 2012 at 3:22 am #

    @Naughty – JJRoberts is a cultural Marxist, whether he realizes it or not, and either he doesn’t get the full ramifications of his politics, he’s a feminist who uses such politics to try and seem cool to women, or he has another agenda that he’ll never quit pushing for (marxism).

    “which does not change the fact that the notion of infidelity (for men or women) is a ridiculous and artificial Sex 2.0 concept that you are best rid of.”

    Notice is use of meaningless adjectives as the core ‘argument’ used to attempt to prove a point. Notice the completely empty argument. Using the terms “ridiculous”, a”artificial” and “fear” are not arguments JJ. Ironically, they are shaming tactics. You know, the very thing that you warn against? A typical Marxist hypocrite.

    I’d be all for listening to legitimate non-fallacious social arguments for that POV, but I’ve yet to encounter one. Especially not one that stands up to social, let alone rhetorical, scrutiny.

    Lately, I’ve noticed that particular POV actively promoted more than ever before. All of the same catch words and shaming tactics are used each time, and a legitimate argument is absent each time. It must be a club or something. All of the deeper arguments for the article’s POV aside, the view of JJ and his friends comes off as either rookie white night BS or rookie absence of an abundance mindset (keep all of the women culturally slutty so that none of my sex partner pool doesn’t diminish).

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Links & Ladies: November 2, 2012 - November 2, 2012

    […] of NYC, and how the storm killed all the subway rats. Even more photos.Naughty Nomad: “On the most primal level, a man doesn’t want to develop a meaningful relationship a woman who …”Virgle Kent sings the praises of the fatigue jacket.The War Nerd goes to Saudi Arabia. Also: […]

  2. LIGFY – November Savings Time | Society of Amateur Gentlemen - November 4, 2012

    […] Naughty Nomad – Brave New World […]

Leave a Reply

[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]